Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40943818›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

Injectable Porcine Collagen in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Delphi Consensus.

Orazio De Lucia, Federico Giarda, Andrea Bernetti, Chiara Ceccarelli, Giulia Letizia Mauro, Fabrizio Gervasoni, Lisa Berti, Antonio Robecchi Majnardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Orazio De LuciaClinical Rheumatology Unit, Department of Rheumatology and Medical Sciences, ASST Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico G. Pini-CTO, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-6661
Federico GiardaUnit of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, ASST Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Andrea BernettiDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-9831
Chiara CeccarelliDepartment of Rehabilitation, Versilia Hospital, AUSL Tuscany Nordovest, Lido di Camaiore, 55041 Lucca, Italy.
Giulia Letizia MauroDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Stomatology, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Fabrizio GervasoniASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Lisa BertiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Antonio Robecchi MajnardiIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Department of Medicine, Neurology and Rehabilitation, Ospedale San Luca, 55100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-6438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMusculoskeletal disorders causing chronic pain are increasingly prevalent due to factors such as injury, overuse, and aging, leading to interest in porcine collagen injections as a potential therapeutic and conservative option. Despite promising results, evidence-based information on this treatment is scarce. To address this gap, the authors conducted an eDelphi consensus among expert Italian physicians in musculoskeletal pain to gather their perspectives on collagen injections.

methodsA Steering Committee and a Panel of 23 physicians developed the statements list (36) including the modalities, safety, and efficacy of intra- and extra-articular collagen injections. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale (5 means "Strong Agreement"). Consensus was defined as when at least 75% of the panelists voted with a score of ≥4/5 after two rounds of votes. The weighted average (WA) was calculated for each statement. As control, we elaborated a Hypothetical Parametric Distribution (HPD WA equal to 3.00), where the percent of panelists is equally distributed along each Likert Scale Value (LSV). The maximum WA for 75% of the consensus is established at 3.75. Indeed, the combination of 75% having WA > 3.75 was defined as "Strong Agreement". While, if the consensus was under 75%, the WA vs. HPD comparison was performed using the Wilcoxon Test. Significant differences among the distribution of LSVs judged the statement as "Low Level of Agreement". Disagreement was evaluated when the WA was under the PHD.

resultsThe consensus was reached "Strong Agreement" after twin rounds in 29 out of 36 (8.55%). In 5 out of 36 statements (13.89%), the panelists reached the "Low Level of Agreement" by statistical tests. In the remaining two statements, there was a "Consensus of Disagreement". All panelists unanimously agreed on crucial points, such as contraindications, non-contraindication based solely on comorbidity, and the importance of monitoring collagen's effectiveness. Unanimous agreement was reached on recommending ultrasound guidance and associating collagen injections with therapeutic exercise and physical modalities. Substantial consensus (concordance > 90%) supported collagen injections for osteoarthritis, chondropathy, and degenerative tendinopathies, emphasizing intra- and peri-articular treatment, even simultaneously. However, areas with limited evidence, such as the combination of collagen with other injectable drugs, treatment of myofascial syndrome, and injection frequency, showed disagreement. The potential of intra-tendinous porcine collagen injections for tendon regeneration yielded mixed results.

conclusionsClinicians experts in musculoskeletal pain agree on using collagen injections to treat pain originating from joints (e.g., osteoarthritis) and periarticular (e.g., tendinopathies).

Indexed as

chronic painconsensusconservative therapyDelphiinflammationmusculoskeletal painosteoarthritisporcine collagen injectionstendinopathyultra-sound guided injection

Identifiers

PMID40943818
PMCPMC12428797

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.