ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Harnessing Regenerative Science in Aesthetic Surgery: The Biologically Driven Future.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regenerative Approaches to Enhance the Skin Microenvironment and Boost Aesthetic Efficacy: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the fields of plastic surgery and dermatology advance, regenerative medicine is positioned to play a transformative role in both aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. This narrative review examines current and emerging applications of biologic therapies, including exosomes, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) with an emphasis on their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and regulatory considerations. We also explore synergistic strategies, such as the combined use of biologics with laser-based technologies, which may enhance therapeutic outcomes. Looking forward, we highlight promising developments in mitochondrial-based therapies, microRNA-based therapies, synthetic exosome mimetics, and AI-assisted biologic design, offering a framework for personalized, precision-driven interventions. By synthesizing existing clinical data alongside scientific and ethical challenges, this narrative review provides a comprehensive perspective on how regenerative therapies are transforming the landscape of aesthetics. Ultimately, successful integration of these innovations will require rigorous validation, ethical responsibility, and a patient-centered approach by plastic surgeons and dermatologists to ensure both safety and accessibility in mainstream practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.