ArticleAllergy2026
International Evidence-Based Guidelines for Traditional Chinese Medicine Management of Allergic Rhinitis.
Article in Allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Evidence-Based Guidelines for Traditional Chinese Medicine Management of Allergic Rhinitis.Allergy · 2026Article
- Core outcome set for Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment of adult allergic rhinitis: study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Impacts of specific acupuncture techniques combined with infrared radiation therapy on the symptom improvement and quality of life of patients with allergic rhinitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a cold-heat syndrome classification model for children with allergic rhinitis based on multimodal data.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
75 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent chronic condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life and poses challenges to effective management. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers a holistic approach, emphasizing syndrome differentiation, individualized care, and natural treatment strategies. To develop comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for AR management using TCM interventions, incorporating rigorous evidence assessment and expert consensus. The guidelines were developed using the GRADE-TCM framework, analyzing 351 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 43,276 participants. Supplementary evidence from published textbooks, standardized documents, ancient literature, and TCM medical records was incorporated. Five rounds of expert consensus, involving 80 expert person-times and over 10,000 valid responses, refined the recommendations. The guidelines provide 32 recommendations covering four primary TCM syndromes (Deficiency-cold of Lung Qi, Spleen Qi Deficiency and Weakness, Kidney-yang Deficiency, and Latent Heat in Lung Meridian) which are mainly involved in AR. These recommendations include both internal interventions (such as herbal and patent medicines) and external therapies (such as acupuncture, moxibustion, and other acupoint-based treatment). Of these interventions, 10 received strong recommendations, while 22 were classified as weak recommendations. TCM treatments demonstrated significant efficacy in alleviating AR symptoms, reducing recurrence, and improving quality of life. Additionally, TCM can complement conventional AR treatments by reducing the need for pharmacological therapy while maintaining a favorable safety profile. The guidelines integrate classical TCM principles with modern evidence-based methodologies, offering a structured framework for AR management. They serve as clinical references for practitioners worldwide, supporting a promising approach to AR treatment. Future updates will incorporate emerging evidence and real-world clinical data to further optimize the role of TCM in AR management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.