SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Effect of eight different acupuncture and moxibustion therapies on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide, and nearly 30% of affected patients experience breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Some evidence suggests that acupuncture and moxibustion therapies are safe and effective in the treatment of BCRL. Nevertheless, there is controversy regarding the optimal acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for BCRL.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare and rank the efficacy of different acupuncture and moxibustion therapies for BCRL, to identify the best acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for BCRL, and to provide a reference for clinicians to choose the treatment modality.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CQVIP, Wanfang Data, and SINOMED Databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for BCRL from inception to March 30, 2023. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment, and data were analyzed and plotted using R4.3.2 and Stata 15.1 software.
resultsWe included 27 RCTs including 8 acupuncture interventions with a sample size of 1976 cases. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that acupuncture + moxibustion, moxibustion, blood-letting puncture and cupping, and electroacupuncture combined with conventional rehabilitation were superior to conventional rehabilitation alone in reducing arm circumference. Moxibustion combined with conventional rehabilitation was superior to conventional rehabilitation alone in reducing the degree of edema. Electroacupuncture and acupoint massage combined with conventional rehabilitation were superior to conventional rehabilitation alone in reducing the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. And in terms of improving the mobility of the shoulder joint, moxibustion and electroacupuncture combined with conventional rehabilitation were better than conventional rehabilitation alone.
conclusionThe combination of acupuncture and moxibustion therapy with conventional rehabilitation can improve the efficacy of BCRL. Acupuncture + moxibustion was the best treatment modality to reduce arm circumference, acupuncture was the best modality to reduce edema, and electroacupuncture was the most effective modality for relieving BCRL pain symptoms and was the best choice to improve abduction range of motion (ROM). Due to the limitations of this study, this conclusion remains to be validated by further high-quality clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944772What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.