Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40944813›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2025

Evaluating anthropometric indices of obesity for early osteoarthritis detection: focus on body fat percentage and relative fat mass.

Zhengrong Qi, Ruiqi Cao, Haomiao Yu, Zhiyao Li, Qiang Li, Zuling Yi, Lifeng Ma, Yan Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhengrong QiDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Ruiqi CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Haomiao YuDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zhiyao LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Qiang LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zuling YiDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Lifeng MaDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. pekmalf@163.com.
Yan YangDepartment of Endocrinology, the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China. yangyan_0329@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-7406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOsteoarthritis is a prevalent joint disorder with a significant global burden. Identifying individuals at risk for osteoarthritis is essential, and obesity indices may be the key to early detection. This study aimed to explore the relationships between anthropometric indices of obesity and osteoarthritis and to assess their predictive abilities.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 54,041 participants aged 20 years or older from NHANES cycles spanning 1999 to 2023. Anthropometric indices of obesity included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), body roundness index (BRI), body fat percentage (BFP), relative fat mass (RFM), and conicity index (CI). Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were conducted to evaluate the associations and predictive capacities of these indices for osteoarthritis.

resultsBMI, WC, WHtR, WWI, BRI, BFP, RFM, and CI were independently positively associated with osteoarthritis risk. RFM (OR = 1.662, 95% CI 1.571 ~ 1.757, P < 0.001) and BFP (OR = 1.555, 95% CI 1.494 ~ 1.617, P < 0.001) showed the strongest associations. The AUCs for the indices ranged from 0.581 to 0.706. BFP had the largest AUC (0.706, 95% CI 0.700 ~ 0.712), with an optimal cut-off of 35.922 (sensitivity, 71.292%; specificity, 59.258%), followed by WWI (AUC = 0.660, 95% CI 0.653 ~ 0.667), CI (AUC = 0.647, 95% CI 0.640 ~ 0.654), and RFM (AUC = 0.639, 95% CI 0.632 ~ 0.646).

conclusionBFP and RFM emerged as valuable tools for early osteoarthritis identification. Key Points • Anthropometric indices of obesity are positively associated with osteoarthritis and can serve as predictors of its risk. • Relative fat mass (RFM) demonstrates the strongest association with osteoarthritis risk. • Body fat percentage (BFP) exhibits the strongest predictive ability for osteoarthritis. • BFP and RFM are recommended for early osteoarthritis identification.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueObesityOsteoarthritisAdultAgedAnthropometryBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsAnthropometric indices of obesityBody fat percentageConicity indexOsteoarthritisRelative fat mass

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.