ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Detecting decompensation in cirrhotic patients with varying ascitic volumes using magnetic resonance elastography.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to detect decompensation in cirrhotic patients with varying volumes of ascites using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).
methodsWe prospectively reviewed 70 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent 3D MRE and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients were categorized into three groups based on clinical information and ascitic volume: compensated cirrhosis with no or minimal ascites (Group A, n = 30), decompensated cirrhosis with no or minimal ascites (Group B, n = 21), and decompensated cirrhosis with massive ascites (Group C, n = 19). Laboratory indicators were collected, and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was calculated. Liver shear stiffness (LSS) and relative liver enhancement (RLE) were measured and compared among the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the role of LSS in detecting decompensated cirrhosis with no or minimal ascites. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with this condition.
resultsThe LSS in Group A (3.68 ± 0.20 kPa) was significantly lower than in Group B (5.95 ± 0.50 kPa) and Group C (6.27 ± 0.68 kPa) (both p < 0.001). The RLE in Group A (74.6%±4.5%) was significantly higher than in Group B (58.2%±5.1%) (p = 0.035) and Group C (43.5%±3.3%) (p < 0.001). ROC analysis indicated that LSS effectively differentiates between Group A and Group B (area under the ROC curve is 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.95). Multivariable analysis identified LSS as an independent risk factor for decompensated cirrhosis with no or minimal ascites.
conclusionMRE is a valuable tool for noninvasively guiding decompensation risk stratification in patients with varying volumes of ascites, particularly those with no or minimal ascites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40944877What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.