ArticleJACC. Advances2025
A Randomized Trial of a Resilience-Building Intervention in Adult Outpatients With Congenital Heart Disease: Feasibility and Efficacy.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738474 (Assessing and Promoting Resilience in Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing and Promoting Resilience in Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resilience and comfort with advance care planning among adult outpatients with congenital heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Psychological Resilience in Surgery: Psychobiological Pathways, Clinical Impact, and Perioperative Modulation-A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventions are needed to address growing concerns regarding poor psychosocial and mental health in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). Strengthening patients' resilience is one proposed pathway, given its ability to improve quality of life in other patient populations.
objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of a resilience-building intervention in ACHD.
methodsWe conducted a clinical trial of outpatients with moderate or complex ACHD, randomized to receive a cognitive-behavioral intervention (Promoting Resilience in Stress Management [PRISM]) vs usual care. Participants completed surveys at randomization and 3 months. We evaluated feasibility using enrollment and retention rates. We evaluated PRISM's effect on the primary outcome (change in self-reported resilience) and exploratory outcomes using linear regression adjusted for baseline measurement.
resultsWe enrolled 78 patients from March 2023 to April 2024. Patients were randomized to treatment (PRISM; n = 40, age 36 ± 11 years; 50% female; 58% self-reported White race/ethnicity) vs control (n = 38, age 40 ± 12 years; 74% female; 79% White). Over three-quarters of participants randomized to treatment completed PRISM (80%) and follow-up measures. Of controls, 35/38 (92%) completed follow-up measures. Resilience scores at 3 months were higher in the treatment group (n = 30, 30.1 ± 8.1) compared to control (n = 35, 28.7 ± 5.8); this difference was not statistically significant. Mean quality of life at follow-up was significantly higher in the treatment group (79 ± 14 vs 73 ± 14; 95% CI: 0.8-12.7; P = 0.03). Program feedback was positive.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates intervention feasibility with modifications. Although we did not demonstrate efficacy, participants were engaged and provided valuable feedback, suggesting value in ACHD. (Assessing and Promoting Resilience in Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease [PRISMACHD]; NCT04738474).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.