Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2026
A comparison of the effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on the quality of recovery after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oliceridine versus sufentanil: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Determination of the 90% effective dose of propofol combined with oliceridine or fentanyl for inhibiting the insertion response in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a dose-finding trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Oliceridine versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Women Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Double‑Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Effect of oliceridine pretreatment on etomidate-induced myoclonus: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Oliceridine versus Sufentanil for Postoperative Recovery and Opioid-Related Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- The Satisfactory Analgesia and Minimal Emesis of Elderly Patients After Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: Oliceridine versus Sufentanil in a Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- The median effective dose of esketamine with different doses of oliceridine during hysteroscopic surgery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Comment on "A comparison of the effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on the quality of recovery after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial" by Ke et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Clarifying respiratory safety end points in nonintubated hysteroscopic anesthesia.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOliceridine is a G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist that selectively activates G protein signaling while significantly reducing β-arrestin pathway recruitment. Clinical data indicate that this unique signaling bias may help mitigate common adverse effects associated with traditional opioids. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery.
methodsIn this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 108 patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the oliceridine group (Group O) or the sufentanil group (Group S). The primary outcome was the 15-item Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15) score assessed at 24 h post-operatively.
resultsOne hundred one patients were included in the analysis (Group O: n = 51; Group S: n = 50). At 24 h post-operatively, Group O had significantly higher total QoR-15 scores than Group S did (123 [IQR 120-125] vs. 116.5 [IQR 114-118]; difference = 6.5, P < 0.001). Group O also scored higher on specific QoR-15 domains: enjoyment of food, general well-being, and nausea or vomiting. Adverse events were less common in Group O, which had significantly lower rates of respiratory depression and nausea/vomiting. Intraoperative monitoring revealed less pronounced effects on heart and respiratory rates in Group O vs. Group S. No statistically significant differences were observed in sedation onset time, total propofol dose, or emergence time.
conclusionWhen compared with sufentanil, oliceridine significantly enhanced early postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery while reducing the incidence of respiratory depression and nausea/vomiting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40946263What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.