Evidence mapPaperPMID 40947303Full record

ReviewBMJ open2025

Rising to the challenges of research in multiple long-term conditions: health and social care research ecosystem approaches.

Anthony De Soyza, Victoria A Goodwin, Kate Roberts, Jane Masoli, Jacqueline Mathews, John Wilding, Gary Nestor, Peter Bower

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anthony De SoyzaNewcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Victoria A GoodwinAgeing and Rehabilitation, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3860-9607
Kate RobertsMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
Jane MasoliAgeing and Honorary Consultant Geriatrician, Department of Clinical and Biomedical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jacqueline MathewsNIHR Research Delivery Network Coordinating Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK jacqueline.mathews@nihr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2589-5675
John WildingDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Liverpool, UK.
Gary NestorNIHR Research Delivery Network Coordinating Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Peter BowerNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-3349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this article is to share insights from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) in delivering research for Multiple Long Term Conditions (MLTC) and to highlight lessons of wider relevance across the research ecosystem. KEY REFLECTIONS: Designing health and care systems to be more responsive to the needs of people living with MLTC requires a considerable evidence base. When compared with research focused on a single disease area, research relating to MLTC raises unique considerations at the stages of planning, placing, and delivering research studies. Our article describes challenges associated with MLTC research outcomes and outlines different types of interventions to target MLTC, along with related research delivery considerations. Our article also raises important considerations for placing research in the most appropriate setting and highlights the vital role of robust feasibility studies, informed by the lived experience of patients and carers with MLTC, for ensuring that studies are conducted, recruited to, and completed in a timely and appropriate way.

conclusionIncreasing the evidence base for the prevention and management of MLTC is a necessity for our health and care system. This presents novel challenges that require collaboration between multiple stakeholders. The UK benefits from a unique research infrastructure, including support for the stages of planning and delivery of health and care research. As the health and care system moves towards bringing care closer to patients and service users, the appropriate selection of the health and care settings and research sites in which to deliver MLTC research, in addition to understanding and removing barriers to recruitment and participation for people with MLTCs, are important considerations to enable us to collectively respond to this challenge.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansResearch DesignUnited KingdomFeasibility StudiesMultimorbidityResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID40947303
PMCPMC12434738

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.