SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Sarcopenic obesity and risk of cardio-cerebrovascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DXA-Measured Total and Regional Fat-to-Lean Mass Ratio and Mortality Risk in Chinese Older Adults: A 20-Year Prospective Study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Incident Sarcopenic Obesity: A 17-Year Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Resting Energy Expenditure and Metabolic Adaptation Following Sleeve Gastrectomy in Hispanic Adults with Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Effects of a One-Year Multicomponent Exercise Program on Community-Dwelling Older Adults at Risk of Sarcopenic Obesity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenic obesity, characterized by reduced muscle mass and excessive fat, has not been adequately studied regarding its impact on cardio-cerebrovascular disease (CCVD) and related mortality.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between sarcopenic obesity, CCVD risk, and associated mortality.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, Technology Journal Database, and Chinese Biological Medical Database, considering articles from inception to April 1, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, evaluated study quality, and extracted data. Both fixed- and random-effects models were used to pool the estimates of odds ratios (ORs). Publication and sensitivity bias analyses tested the robustness of associations.
resultsA total of 28 studies, comprising 575,942 participants, were included. The results demonstrated a significant association between sarcopenic obesity and an increased risk of CCVD (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.70-2.48, I² = 71%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses further indicated that sarcopenic obesity defined by combined measures of muscle mass, muscle strength, and body mass index was associated with a 9.22-fold increased risk of CCVD, and a 2.10-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but no significant association with the risk of stroke was observed. In contrast, when assessing CCVD mortality, seven studies found no significant overall association (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.99-2.53, I² = 92%; p = 0.05). However, in subgroup analyses, significant associations emerged in studies with larger sample sizes (≥5000 participants; OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.37-2.27, p < 0.01) and longer follow-up durations (≥10 years; OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16-2.04, p < 0.01).
conclusionsSarcopenic obesity is associated with an increased risk of CCVD, and its long-term impact on CCVD mortality may be more evident in studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods. These findings underscore the need for well-designed prospective studies employing standardized diagnostic criteria and adequate follow-up to confirm the observed associations and clarify their clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40947451What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.