Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40947472›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Comparison of classic Sanger and next generation sequencing mitotypes of second world war victims from Konfin I mass grave.

Marcel Obal, Irena Zupanič Pajnič

Abstract readComparative StudyHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcel ObalInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-3351
Irena Zupanič PajničInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia. irena.zupanic@mf.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-015X

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS J-3080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid technological advancements have significantly enhanced DNA analysis. A key innovation is Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), also known as Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS), which followed classic Sanger (CS) sequencing. Compared to CS, NGS offers higher sensitivity, resolution, and throughput, making it particularly valuable for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis. The high copy number, matrilineal inheritance, and non-recombining nature of mtDNA, especially its hypervariable regions (HV), make it highly relevant in forensic investigations. NGS has introduced streamlined protocols and improved low-level heteroplasmy detection in mtDNA sequencing. However, with any new technology, its informativeness and authenticity must be evaluated against traditional methods. This study compared mitotypes from degraded WWII skeletal remains recovered from a Slovenian mass grave, using the same DNA extraction method to minimize pre-sequencing variability. Femurs were mechanically and chemically cleaned, pulverized, and fully demineralized. DNA was extracted and purified using EZ1 Advanced XL and quantified with an in-house protocol. CS sequencing was performed using BigDye Terminator Kit v1.1 and ABI PRISM™ 3130 Genetic Analyzer, while NGS was conducted with the Precision ID mtDNA Control Region Panel and Ion GeneStudio™ S5 System. Comparison of mitotypes revealed that NGS identified low-level heteroplasmies undetectable by CS, particularly in length heteroplasmy. However, since Ion Torrent™ Suite 5.10.1 is prone to errors, certain NGS variants had to be disregarded.

Indexed as

DNA, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNABody RemainsBurialDNA FingerprintingFemurHumansMaleSloveniaWorld War IIDNA, MitochondrialMtDNANext generation sequencingSanger sequencingSkeletal remainsWWII

Identifiers

PMID40947472
PMCPMC12808251

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.