SynthesisClinical cardiology2025
Comparative Effectiveness of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Inhibitors on Lipid Profiles in Adults With Hyperlipidemia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Failure to Promise: Obicetrapib and the Renaissance of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHyperlipidemia, a key risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, such as anacetrapib, obicetrapib, evacetrapib, dalcetrapib, and torcetrapib, aim to improve lipid profiles by increasing HDL-C and reducing LDL-C, but their comparative efficacy remains unclear.
methodsThis systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA-NMA guidelines, included 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 120,292 adults with hyperlipidemia. We compared CETP inhibitors, alone or with statins, against placebo or other lipid-lowering therapies. Primary outcome was LDL-C reduction; secondary outcomes included HDL-C, triglycerides, and total cholesterol changes. Random-effects models calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P-scores ranked interventions.
resultsAtorvastatin + obicetrapib showed the largest reduction in LDL-C levels (MD: -69.00, 95% CI: -95.96 to -42.04, p < 0.0001), followed by rosuvastatin + obicetrapib (MD: -60.70, 95% CI: -99.28 to -22.12, p = 0.0020). Atorvastatin + obicetrapib yielded highly significant increase in HDL-C levels (MD: 149.90, 95% CI: 121.70 to 178.10, p < 0.0001), but rosuvastatin + obicetrapib showed the greatest increase (MD: 158.90, 95% CI: 118.59 to 199.21, p < 0.0001) and obicetrapib monotherapy (MD: 139.00, 95% CI: 129.05 to 148.96, p < 0.0001), while rosuvastatin + evacetrapib led triglyceride reductions (MD: -31.70 mg/dL). Rosuvastatin was most effective for total cholesterol (MD: -31.60 mg/dL).
conclusionCETP inhibitors, particularly anacetrapib and obicetrapib combined with statins, significantly improve lipid profiles, offering potential therapeutic benefits for hyperlipidemia management and cardiovascular risk reduction.
trial registrationThe study was registered with PROSPERO to ensure transparency and adherence to methodological rigor (Registration ID: CRD420250652666).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.