Evidence mapPaperPMID 40947899Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Exploring the Value of Continuous Plantar Temperature Monitoring for Diabetic Foot Health Management: Observational, Prospective Cohort Study.

Maryam Hajizadeh, Emily Matijevich, Emily Bray, Evan Minty, Brock Liden

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maryam HajizadehOrpyx Medical Technologies, 1240 20 Ave SE Suite 205, Calgary, AB, T2G 1M8, Canada, 1 5146638551.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1424-499X
Emily MatijevichOrpyx Medical Technologies, 1240 20 Ave SE Suite 205, Calgary, AB, T2G 1M8, Canada, 1 5146638551.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-0107
Emily BrayOrpyx Medical Technologies, 1240 20 Ave SE Suite 205, Calgary, AB, T2G 1M8, Canada, 1 5146638551.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2183-1414
Evan MintyDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-9992
Brock LidenCutting Edge Research LLC, Circleville, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6023-2582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a life-changing complication of diabetes. There is increasing evidence that remote plantar temperature monitoring can reduce the recurrence of DFUs. Monitoring of foot temperature once a day is the current guideline for identifying early signs of foot inflammation. However, single readings of physiological signals can increase the risk of misdiagnosis when the signals fluctuate throughout the day. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraday temperature asymmetry signals were stable or varied as a function of time in individuals at risk of DFUs. Methods: In total, 64 participants with diabetes (mean age 68, SD 13.8 y) were provided with multimodal sensory insoles (Orpyx Sensory Insoles) to monitor continuous temperature data at a frequency of once per minute at 5 plantar locations in a 90-day study window. The augmented Dickey-Fuller test was used to determine whether the temperature asymmetry signals were stationary (ie, indicating constant mean and variance over time) or nonstationary (ie, indicating time-varying behaviors or trends in the signal). Results: The study included 43 participants, 1080 data days, and 5400 contralateral temperature asymmetry signals. Most (4428/5400, 82%) of the temperature asymmetry signals were nonstationary, with intraday fluctuations likely influenced by physiological and environmental factors. Of the nonstationary signals, nearly half (1948/4428, 44%) fluctuated above and below the concerning asymmetry threshold of 2.2 °C. The intraday variability underscores the potential for false-positive and false-negative hot spot detection with once-daily measurements. Substantial variability was observed in stationarity patterns both within and across participants. Notably, concerning asymmetries in nonstationary signals occurred at different time points across participants, measurement windows, and days. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the value of continuous plantar temperature monitoring for diabetic foot health management, relative to once-daily measurements. Several repeated measurements throughout the day increase confidence with regard to the accuracy of observed plantar physiology trends. Continuous monitoring may improve the accuracy of plantar temperature measurement, unlock new diagnostic capabilities, and support personalized care.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFootHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective Studiescontinuous temperature monitoringdiabetic foot ulcerremote patient monitoringsensor-based monitoringtemperaturewearables

Identifiers

PMID40947899
PMCPMC12431787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.