Trial reportAnnals of medicine2025
X-CircuiT and conventional exercise in home-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease and risk factors: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study evaluated the effectiveness of Xiangya Hospital Circuit Training (X-CircuiT), a multi-component exercise program, as an alternative to conventional exercise (ConEx) in improving cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness within home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) for patients with coronary artery disease and risk factors (CADRF). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis randomized controlled non-inferiority trial consecutively enrolled patients with CADRF at Xiangya Hospital, China, between April and December 2020. Patients were assigned to a smartphone-guided X-CircuiT-HBCR or telephone call-guided ConEx-HBCR group for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness (peak oxygen uptake,
resultsThis trial included 54 participants (median age 53 yr, 37% females), with 27 per group. Both groups showed significant improvements in fitness. There were no significant differences between groups in the improvements in
conclusionsX-CircuiT is non-inferior to ConEx in HBCR for CADRF patients, suggesting it as an effective alternative or supplement in HBCR programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000032451.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.