ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2025
Deep learning enhances precision diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: future prospects.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feature Selection and Machine Learning Strategies for CT Radiomics-Based Survival Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A systematic evaluation of explainable AI methods for high-dimensional transcriptome-based cancer survival prediction.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a major form of pulmonary malignancy and a leading global cause of cancer-related mortality, highlights the urgent need for advanced precision treatment approaches. This article comprehensively reviews the significant progress and future directions of deep learning techniques in revolutionizing the precise diagnosis and therapeutic management of NSCLC. It demonstrates how deep learning methods have the potential to surpass traditional tumor treatment paradigms, significantly enhancing diagnostic accuracy, personalizing treatment selection, and predicting patient outcomes with greater precision. The article traces the evolution of deep learning models in this field, from basic analyses relying on single data modalities, such as imaging or genomics alone, to more sophisticated architectures capable of multimodal data fusion. It emphasizes the crucial role of integrating radiological, pathological, genomic, and clinical data in uncovering deeper biological insights. Furthermore, it outlines the typical workflow involved in developing and deploying deep learning applications for NSCLC and lists some currently used models, including convolutional neural networks for image analysis and complex architectures for multi-omics data integration. These models show considerable potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing therapeutic interventions. However, translating these computational tools into routine clinical practice faces several challenges. The review candidly addresses key issues, including the need for large-scale, high-quality, and standardized datasets; the "black box" nature of complex models, which requires improved interpretability to gain clinicians' trust and provide actionable insights; and profound ethical considerations regarding data privacy, algorithmic bias, and equitable access. Despite these obstacles, deep learning has emerged as a powerful instrument in the oncological arsenal, significantly enhancing the precision and efficiency of NSCLC care. Finally, the article offers a dialectical perspective on the future of deep learning in NSCLC, exploring emerging trends and providing recommendations to overcome current limitations, with the goal of maximizing its potential to improve patient survival and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.