SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
Therapeutic effects and safety of resveratrol for lung cancer: an updated preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resveratrol Modulates Lung Cancer-Associated Hub Genes Identified by Integrated Bioinformatics, Single-Cell Analysis, Molecular Docking, and Experimental Validation.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, while there are limited treatment methods. Resveratrol (RESV), a natural food-derived compound, has attracted attention around the world for its anti-LC effects. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of RESV for LC. Purpose: This study aimed to provide preclinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of RESV for LC, and to find the optimal dose and duration. Methods: Results: A total of 23 studies involving 425 animals were included. The methodological quality of included studies was medium-to-low. RESV significantly reduced tumor volume, tumor weight, and lung metastases number, and increased apoptotic cell proportion, while having no effect on body weight. High heterogeneity was observed, and subgroup analysis suggested that the heterogeneity was partly attributed to the dose of RESV. The optimal dose and duration of RESV were 30-100 mg/kg and 25-28 days, respectively. The median lethal dose of RESV was 1,560 mg/kg. Conclusion: RESV demonstrated a significant inhibitory effect on LC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.