ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Clinical and MRI variables associated with close or positive margins during breast-conserving surgery using MRI projection mapping in breast carcinoma with nonmass enhancement.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) projection mapping system (PMS) for determining the resection lines during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with breast cancer presenting with nonmass enhancement (NME) and identify the clinical or MRI variables associated with close or positive margins. Materials and methods: Forty-one patients with breast cancer exhibiting NME were enrolled. In the operating room, a maximum intensity projection image generated from supine MRI was projected onto the breast using a PMS, which employed a structured light method to measure the surface of the breast. Cancer contours delineated on the MRI-PMS, with an additional safety margin, served as the resection lines for cylindrical BCS. Margins were pathologically categorized as negative (> 2 mm), close (≤ 2 mm), or positive. The association between margin status and clinical or MRI variables was analyzed. Results: Surgical margins were negative in 24 patients (58.5 %), close in 15 (36.6 %), and positive in 2 (4.9 %). There were significant differences in the maximum diameter of nonmass components (NMCs) shown by pathology, that of NME on MRI, and the discrepancy between the two diameters between patients with negative margin and those with close or positive margin (< 0.05 for all). Receiver operating characteristics revealed that threshold of 40 mm for NMEs provided high specificity of 91.7 %. Conclusion: The MRI-PMS led to a low rate of positive margins during BCS in patients with breast cancer with NMEs. Large NMCs and NMEs are associated with positive or close margin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.