Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40948880›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025

Clinical and MRI variables associated with close or positive margins during breast-conserving surgery using MRI projection mapping in breast carcinoma with nonmass enhancement.

Maki Amano, Jun Ozeki, Yumi Koyama, Xiaoyan Tang, Fumi Nozaki, Mayumi Tani, Yasuo Amano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maki AmanoDepartments of Radiology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.
Jun OzekiDepartments of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.
Yumi KoyamaDepartments of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.
Xiaoyan TangDepartments of Pathology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.
Fumi NozakiDepartments of Pathology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.
Mayumi TaniDepartments of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.
Yasuo AmanoDepartments of Radiology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) projection mapping system (PMS) for determining the resection lines during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with breast cancer presenting with nonmass enhancement (NME) and identify the clinical or MRI variables associated with close or positive margins. Materials and methods: Forty-one patients with breast cancer exhibiting NME were enrolled. In the operating room, a maximum intensity projection image generated from supine MRI was projected onto the breast using a PMS, which employed a structured light method to measure the surface of the breast. Cancer contours delineated on the MRI-PMS, with an additional safety margin, served as the resection lines for cylindrical BCS. Margins were pathologically categorized as negative (> 2 mm), close (≤ 2 mm), or positive. The association between margin status and clinical or MRI variables was analyzed. Results: Surgical margins were negative in 24 patients (58.5 %), close in 15 (36.6 %), and positive in 2 (4.9 %). There were significant differences in the maximum diameter of nonmass components (NMCs) shown by pathology, that of NME on MRI, and the discrepancy between the two diameters between patients with negative margin and those with close or positive margin (< 0.05 for all). Receiver operating characteristics revealed that threshold of 40 mm for NMEs provided high specificity of 91.7 %. Conclusion: The MRI-PMS led to a low rate of positive margins during BCS in patients with breast cancer with NMEs. Large NMCs and NMEs are associated with positive or close margin.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast-conserving surgeryDuctal carcinoma in situInvasive lobular carcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingNonmass enhancementProjection mapping system

Identifiers

PMID40948880
PMCPMC12423701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.