Evidence mapPaperPMID 40948974Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Tendon mechanobiology in the context of tendon biofabrication.

Clemens Gögele, Girish Pattappa, Herbert Tempfer, Denitsa Docheva, Gundula Schulze-Tanzil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clemens GögeleInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Girish PattappaDepartment of Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration, Orthopaedic Hospital König-Ludwig-Haus, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Herbert TempferInstitute of Tendon and Bone Regeneration, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Denitsa DochevaDepartment of Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration, Orthopaedic Hospital König-Ludwig-Haus, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Gundula Schulze-TanzilInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendons are often affected by injuries or tendinopathies, resulting in serious and long-lasting impairments. The repair capacity is very low with a high risk of rerupture. Nevertheless, early, moderate and intermittent functional training adapted to the healing process has been shown to support tendon healing. The mechanosensitive tenocytes are responsible for extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, a process that is highly dependent on their specific and local mechanotopographical niche. The mechanical stimuli are triggered by the surrounding ECM that are then recognized by the cells via mechanosensation, transduced via activated intracellular molecular cascades to initiate the mechanoresponse, a process known as mechanotransduction. Hereby, the activation of calcium (Ca

Indexed as

biofabricationcyclic stretchmechanoresponsemechanosensationmechanostimulationmechanotransductiontendontenocytes

Identifiers

PMID40948974
PMCPMC12423559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.