Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949028›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in toxicology2025

The impact of perfumes and cosmetic products on human health: a narrative review.

Sharifa Alblooshi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sharifa AlblooshiCollege of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of perfumes and cosmetic products is widespread, serving personal hygiene, aesthetic, and olfactory functions. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential health impacts associated with long-term exposure to various ingredients used in these products. Objectives: This narrative review aims to synthesize evidence on the health risks associated with perfumes and cosmetics, focusing on specific health concerns, including fertility, respiratory health, cancer risk, allergies, skin disorders, endocrine disruption, and neurological effects. It also discusses the presence of heavy metals in cosmetics, regulatory challenges, and the need for transparency in ingredient disclosure. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature that was published between 2005 and 2024 was conducted, examining findings from interdisciplinary studies relevant to the health impacts of cosmetic and fragrance products. The review highlights health concerns linked to specific chemical components, including synthetic chemicals such as phthalates, parabens, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Results: The findings indicate that many synthetic chemicals in perfumes and cosmetics are associated with adverse health outcomes. These include allergies, respiratory issues, endocrine disruption, reproductive problems, and potentially cancer. Heavy metals in cosmetics also pose significant health risks. Despite regulatory guidelines, the cumulative and long-term effects of combined exposure to multiple cosmetic ingredients remain poorly understood and inadequately addressed. Conclusion: There is a pressing need for stricter regulatory oversight and improved transparency in ingredient disclosure to safeguard consumer health. Further research is required to clarify the long-term health risks associated with the daily use of cosmetic products and to develop safer alternatives.

Indexed as

consumer safetycosmeticsendocrine disruptionhealth risksheavy metalsPerfumesregulatory guidelinessynthetic chemicals

Identifiers

PMID40949028
PMCPMC12425936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.