ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2025
Establishment and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram Model for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the correlation between blood biomarkers and blood glucose fluctuations with the risk of osteoporosis (OP) in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to construct a predictive nomogram for OP. Methods: Based on bone mineral density (BMD) results from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), participants were divided into OP (BMD T-value ≤ -2.5 SD) and Non-OP (BMD T-value > -2.5 SD) groups. Logistic analysis were used to explore the potential risk factors, following by the construction of a nomogram to predict the risk of OP. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated using concordance index (C-index), area under curve (AUC), and calibration curves. Results: We finally included 381 participants, with 147 in the OP group. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between age and SII, and a negative correlation between BMI and CV. SII and CV demonstrated a positive dose-response relationship with OP, while FT3 exhibited a negative relationship. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that age (OR=1.088, 95% CI 1.052-1.125, P<0.001), BMI (OR=0.772, 95% CI 0.702-0.848, P<0.001), SII (OR=1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.005, P<0.001), FT3 (OR=0.529, 95% CI 0.280-0.998, P=0.049), and CV (OR=1.051, 95% CI 1.007-1.097, P=0.022) were independent risk factors. The subgroup analysis showed the correlation between SII and OP occurred primarily in individuals aged ≥60 years. A predictive nomogram model was constructed based on age, BMI, SII, FT3, and CV, with a C-index of 0.842 (range 0.801-0.883). Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) demonstrated good clinical fit of the model. Conclusion: SII can predict the OP occurrence in women aged ≥60 years, while FT3 is applicable for predicting OP in women aged ≥70 years and those with a BMI <24 kg/m². The predictive nomogram demonstrated great predictive value in postmenopausal women with T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.