ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Tracking a decade of phase I clinical trials in Italy: trends and insights from national and european registries amid regulatory change.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The future of Italian phase I trials regulation: lessons from a nationwide survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The global clinical research landscape has expanded significantly over the past decade, yet Europe has witnessed a decline in its share of clinical trial activity, especially in early-phase trials. This study aims to characterize the evolution of Phase I clinical trials in Italy from January 2015 through the completion of the European regulatory transition under Regulation (EU) 536/2014 (30 January 2025), by analyzing trends in trial submissions, sponsor typologies, study designs, and participant populations. Methods: A systematic extraction of data was conducted from the Italian Results: A total of 1,051 Phase I clinical trials were submitted during the study period, accounting for 14.4% of all clinical trial applications in Italy. Commercial sponsors dominated (90.6%), and oncology was the leading therapeutic area (69.6%). The overall regulatory authorization rate was high, with no statistically significant difference between commercial and non-commercial sponsors (89.5% vs. 86.9%, respectively; p > 0.05). Trials exclusively involving healthy volunteers were limited (3.4%). Among the 3,777 IMPs analyzed, chemical compounds prevailed (66.1%), followed by biologics (28.7%) and Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs, 3.3%), the latter showing a steady increase over the decade. Non-commercial sponsor trials more frequently included pediatric and vulnerable populations, thus underlining their distinct contribution to underrepresented areas of clinical research. Conclusion: While Phase I trial activity in Italy remained stable over the past decade, structural imbalances persist-including limited non-commercial engagement, strong therapeutic concentration in oncology, and underuse of healthy volunteer models. Strengthening infrastructure for early development, supporting academic-led studies, and promoting broader inclusion in study populations may help consolidate recent progress and foster a more balanced national research ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.