ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Dupilumab in patients with bullous pemphigoid and concomitant atopy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are chronic inflammatory skin diseases that may share overlapping immunopathogenic mechanisms, particularly a type 2 immune response. Emerging evidence suggests that dupilumab, an IL-4Rα antagonist, may be effective in treating both conditions. Methods: In this retrospective case series, twelve patients (mean age: 78.6 years; range: 67-93 years) with moderate to severe BP and a history of AD were included. All patients received dupilumab and were monitored over 12 weeks. Clinical activity was assessed using BPDAI scores, pruritus NRS, and DLQI. Results: At week 12, complete remission of bullous skin lesions was observed in all patients (100%), with 83.3% already achieving this by week 4. Pruritus improved significantly (p < 0.0001), with 58.3% achieving complete resolution (NRS 0/10) at week 12. Notably, two patients had previously received tralokinumab without clinical improvement, underscoring the distinct efficacy of dupilumab in this setting. Patient satisfaction was uniformly high (score 5/5). No adverse events were reported. Dupilumab was well tolerated, even in elderly, multimorbid patients. Conclusion: Dupilumab appears to be a safe and highly effective treatment for patients with concurrent BP and AD, leading to rapid and sustained symptom control, resolution of skin lesions, and high patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.