ArticleACS omega2025
A Structure-Based Approach for Predicting Odor Similarity of Molecules via Docking Simulations with Human Olfactory Receptors.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Advances in predicting human olfactory perception: from data acquisition to computational models.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Molecular Mechanism Analysis of the Activation of Human Olfactory Receptor OR9Q2 by 4-Methylphenol.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying human odor recognition remain largely unclear, making it challenging to predict the scent of a novel molecule based solely on its molecular structure. Unlike taste, which is classified into a limited number of categories, odor perception is highly complex and lacks universally defined labels, rendering absolute odor classification inherently ambiguous. To address this issue, we propose a relative evaluation framework for odor prediction, focusing on odor similarity rather than absolute descriptors. In this study, we constructed three-dimensional structures of approximately 400 human olfactory receptors (hORs) using AlphaFold2 and performed molecular docking simulations with odorant compounds. Each odorant was represented as a 409-dimensional docking score vector, and odor similarity was inferred by comparing these vectors statistically. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, we used odorant molecules from the ATLAS database and tested whether molecules with similar docking profiles correspond to similar olfactory perceptions. Our results demonstrate that the proposed docking-based method enables the relative prediction of odor similarity between molecules, even for compounds not included in the reference database. This method offers a promising alternative to traditional QSAR-based approaches relying solely on molecular structural similarity, and provides a structure-based, receptor-level framework for computational olfaction.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.