ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Efficacy and safety of combining intestinal stenting with laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients with acute intestinal obstruction.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the management of cancer-related incomplete intestinal obstruction: Therapeutic strategies and emerging interventions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, intestinal stenting combined with laparoscopic surgery has received increasing attention as a treatment option for acute intestinal obstruction. However, its safety and efficacy have not yet been established.
aimTo assess the efficacy and safety of combining intestinal stenting with laparoscopic surgery for the management of acute intestinal obstruction.
methodsClinical data from 74 patients with colorectal cancer and acute intestinal obstruction, who were admitted to the emergency department of the authors' hospital between October 2023 and November 2024, were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical intervention: A control group (emergency open surgery,
resultsIntestinal stent placement was 100% successful in the study group, all of whom experienced relief from obstruction while exhibiting a significantly lower rate of ostomy creation and a higher rate of primary anastomosis than in the control group, as well as less intraoperative blood loss, shorter time to flatus, and shorter hospital stay. The complication rate was 5.41% (2/37; bleeding and re-obstruction), with no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative duration or perioperative mortality. The overall complication rates were 5.41% (2/37) and 21.62% (8/37) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Tumor recurrence and overall survival rates were 2.70% and 97.30% in the study group and 13.51% and 91.89% in the control group, respectively.
conclusionIntestinal stenting relieved acute obstructions, reduced the number of emergency surgeries, and supported laparoscopic procedures while improving primary anastomosis rates, minimizing ostomy occurrence, surgical trauma, and complications, and accelerating recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.