ArticleVessel plus2025
Emerging biomarkers in ischemic stroke.
Article in Vessel plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Omics Integration in Stroke: Neuroinflammatory Endotypes, Immune Cell Crosstalk, and Precision Biomarker Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of Different Doses of Ranolazine on SIRT1, APELA, and APL13 in a Rat MCAO Model.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- GDF-15: Can It Be Used as a Biomarker in Acute Cerebrovascular Incidents?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Copeptin in acute ischemic stroke: a surrogate marker of AVP-system activation with temporal dynamics and clinical implications.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Differential prognostic value of circulating biomarkers across small ischemic stroke subtypes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the differential diagnosis of acute vertigo in the emergency department.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF STROKE: A NARRATIVE REVIEW.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke is a devastating global public health problem and the leading cause of acute death and chronic disability. Despite being the diagnostic cornerstone, limitations in neuroimaging, including availability, cost, and therapeutic window, have rekindled interest in biomarker-based approaches. Biomarkers will be employed to facilitate the eventual prediction, early diagnosis, and prognosis of strokes, as well as to inform person-centered medicine. This review summarizes recent advances in the search for biomarkers related to inflammatory, endothelial, metabolic, and neuroaxonal pathways. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), endothelial microparticles (EMP), and homocysteine serve as predictive biomarkers corresponding to vascular risk and inflammatory priming. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), D-dimer, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are diagnostic markers that can already subtype stroke and estimate lesion burden. Prognostic biomarkers, such as serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), are associated with infarct size and long-term outcomes. The -omic sciences (genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic) have discovered defined molecular signatures and panels with high specificity to describe heterogeneity in stroke. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and newer imaging modalities, such as those provided through positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), offer valuable adjuncts to blood biomarkers in the diagnosis of conditions. Translational potential is hindered by heterogeneity in the transcriptional landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.