Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949661›Full record

ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2024

Knowledge, attitudes and health choices among non-diabetic patients regarding diabetes mellitus.

Mbuyi Roland Tshibeya, Michele Torlutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mbuyi Roland TshibeyaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9041-0406
Michele TorlutterDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-1469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers require better understanding of the current knowledge and behaviours of the local community towards diabetes mellitus (DM) and its prevention before appropriate interventions can be developed to address the gaps. There is currently a paucity of scientific papers on knowledge, attitudes and health choices among the non-diabetic population in a facility setting in South Africa. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a self-reported questionnaire was administered to 165 adult participants attending the Chiawelo Community Practice from 02 March 2020 to 17 April 2020. The study utilised descriptive statistics, Chi-square testing, univariate logistic regression, and multivariate analysis for variable assessment. Results: Almost half of the participants (49%) had good knowledge of DM, with 60% indicating good attitudes and 52% making good health choices to prevent DM. Participants having received education from clinicians were 5.61 times more likely to develop better attitudes and 3.92 times more likely to adopt better health choices towards DM compared to those who obtained information from media or other sources. Conclusion: The study found that poor knowledge of DM does not necessarily translate into poor attitude towards the disease, which is noteworthy. The study also highlighted the important role of healthcare workers in influencing behaviour change. Contribution: Information from this study can be used to strengthen health services through several clinical governance activities including quality improvement, capacity building, health education and community-oriented promotion, and prevention strategies.

Indexed as

attitudesdiabetes mellitushealth choicesknowledgenon-diabetic patientsprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID40949661
PMCPMC12376233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.