ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2025
Intense light as potential future therapy for myocardial injury in patients after non cardiac surgery: lessons from mice and men.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Light therapy in medicine: where do we stand?Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Studies on light-elicited endothelial period circadian regulator 2 (PER2) mediated cardioprotection revealed a critical role of PER2/hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1A) regulated endothelial factor ANGPTL4 for endothelial barrier protection during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI). Based on these observations, we deepened our studies on light-elicited cardioprotective mechanisms. Methods: All animal and human studies had Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) approval. To study myocardial IRI, an in-situ mouse model for myocardial IRI was used. To study light-elicited mechanisms during myocardial IRI, endothelial-specific Results: The PER2 enhancer NOB or the HIF1A activator DMOG protected from myocardial IRI, which was abolished in endothelial-specific Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that only the PER2/HIF1A downstream target ANGPTL4 can overcome an endothelial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.