Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949736›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Macular function measured by Nidek MP-3 microperimeter in normal Chinese individuals across age groups.

Dan Hu, Qiuhai Wang, Qingcui Liu, Emmanuel Eric Pazo, Zhe Liu, Shuang Wu, Wen Zhang, Yan Xing, Bo Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dan Hu *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qiuhai Wang *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qingcui LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Emmanuel Eric PazoTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0848-827X
Zhe LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shuang WuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wen ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yan XingTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bo YuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microperimetry has emerged as a tool for assessing retinal function, especially macular function in recent years. In this study, the MP-3, a widely adopted device, was employed to analyze macular sensitivity and fixation stability across various age groups. Methods: The research involved evaluating the macular sensitivity and fixation stability of 182 healthy eyes free from ocular disorders. The relationship between macular sensitivity, fixation pattern, and age was determined through generalized estimating equations. Results: Macular sensitivity and percentage of fixation stability within 2° and 4° were measured for 182 eyes (mean age: 45.24 ± 17.03 years) using MP-3. The mean macular sensitivity was 29.5 ± 1.6, while the mean percentage of fixation points within a 2° circle was 93.0 ± 7.5%, and within a 4° circle was 98.3 ± 2.8%. Macular sensitivity, as well as the percentage of fixation points within the central 2° and 4° areas, tended diminish with advancing age. Conclusion: In conclusion, among normal subjects, macular sensitivity and fixation values decrease with age. MP-3 emerges as a reliable instrument for measuring macular function.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleFixation, OcularHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleFixation stabilityMacular functionMacular sensitivityMicroperimeter

Identifiers

PMID40949736
PMCPMC12428522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.