ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Influential factors affecting the survival benefit of combined neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: an analysis based on the SEER database.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a major contributor to cancer-related deaths globally, with significant mortality rates. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), involving preoperative chemotherapy or radiation, aims to enhance outcomes in EC when combined with esophagectomy. However, its efficacy varies, necessitating identification of factors influencing survival benefits. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the survival benefit of NAT in patients with EC. Methods: The current retrospective cohort study collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between the NAT and No NAT groups. A Cox model-based residual approach was applied to estimate the likelihood of survival benefit. Logistic regression was used to explore associated factors in the training cohort, and a nomogram was subsequently developed and validated. Results: In total, 2,755 patients were included in this study. Before PSM, the NAT group had a significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) than the No NAT group (31 Conclusions: This study identified clinical features potentially associated with survival benefit from NAT in patients with EC. The nomogram may serve as a reference tool to support treatment planning and patient selection in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.