ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Case Report: Clinical pharmacist prescriber in depression treatment in primary care settings: clinical case focused on prescribing practice.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacotherapy of depression represents a significant challenge in the management of depression in primary care. Although effective treatments have been available, many patients are still not adequately managed. Clinical pharmacists represent one of the possible strategies in the management, although this practice is rarely seen outside the United Kingdom and the United States. Aim: The aim of the case was to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist prescribers on depression treatment. Methods: A longitudinal, observational, case-based medication review by a pharmacist prescriber was conducted for a 63-year-old Slovenian patient in a primary care ambulatory setting. The review included three structured medication review assessments performed by a clinical pharmacist prescriber at defined intervals: first observation, two months post-intervention, and six months after first observation. The pharmacists conducted medication reviews and prescribed medications like physicians, operating within a collaborative practice agreement as dependent prescribers. Predefined outcomes included diabetes management (HbA1c and blood glucose), lipid levels (S-LDL), pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), and quality of life (assessed via EQ-5D-VAS). The patient's complete medication regimens were reviewed, focusing on dosage appropriateness, indication matching, potential drug-drug interactions, and medication adherence. Results: A 63-year-old male Slovenian patient diagnosed with depression, type 2 diabetes with polyneuropathy, and hypothyroidism underwent two medication reviews between December 2024 and July 2025. The pharmacist prescribed amitriptyline and semaglutide (accepted by the patient's physician). Notable improvements were observed in glycemic control (HbA1c reduced from 9.9% to 8.2%), and quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS score improved from 30/100 to 80/100). Depression symptoms also resolved, with the PHQ-9 score improving from 11 to 4. Conclusions: This case study demonstrates that interventions by a clinical pharmacist prescriber during the medication review process resulted in improved clinical outcomes in the treatment of depression, as well as enhanced quality of life. It represents an important contribution to the development of pharmacist prescribing roles in depression management within primary care settings outside of the United Kingdom and the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.