Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950783›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Floral Color and Family Drive Contrasting Plant-Pollinator Responses to Nutrient Enrichment.

Rebecca A Nelson, Elizabeth T Borer, Eric W Seabloom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca A NelsonDepartment of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center Utah State University Logan Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9574-0241
Elizabeth T BorerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-5853
Eric W SeabloomDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-9259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient enrichment has decreased the diversity and abundance of wildflower species, raising questions about whether nutrient enrichment can further decrease the diversity and abundance of pollinators that rely on wildflowers. Whether the effects of nutrient enrichment on plant-pollinator interactions differ by nutrient type remains an open question. Moreover, plant family and flower color, two core axes of pollination niches, may further mediate how wildflowers and their pollinators respond to nutrient enrichment. We tested these questions using a nutrient addition experiment replicated at three grasslands in California, a global plant diversity hotspot. We found that adding nitrogen increased the floral abundance of Asteraceae, while decreasing that of Fabaceae, Geraniaceae, Iridaceae, and Euphorbiaceae. Adding phosphorus and potassium in the absence of nitrogen produced the opposite effects. Pollinator abundance and composition varied strongly by floral family, suggesting that these differing responses to nutrient addition by floral family may alter pollinator community composition. Nitrogen addition decreased the abundance of native blue, native green, and exotic pink flowers, while increasing the abundance of native and exotic yellow and exotic purple flowers. Consequently, nitrogen addition increased pollinator abundance on purple flowers, while decreasing pollinator abundance on pink flowers. Purple and yellow Asteraceae species, which increased under nitrogen enrichment, acted as core hubs in structuring the plant-pollinator network.

Indexed as

eutrophicationfunctional traitsglobal change ecologygrasslandsnutrient networkplant–pollinator interactionsspecies interaction networks

Identifiers

PMID40950783
PMCPMC12432409

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.