ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Long-term cancer risk in users of GLP-1 agonists in Denmark: a nationwide emulated trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations Between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Skin Cancer in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Current Challenges in Monitoring the Safety and Utilisation of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs): A UK Perspective.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and pancreatic outcomes in chronic pancreatitis: a real-world cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- How Negative Controls Are Used in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Scoping Review of Real-World Observational Studies of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Insulin Resistance as a Systemic Metabolic Risk State for Cancer: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Prevention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight management in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and cancer risk: the good, the bad and the unknown.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in the Rehabilitation of Patients with Heart Failure: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Perspectives.Nutrients · 2026Review
- The Insulin-Urothelial Axis: Evaluating Insulin Resistance as a Convergent Driver of Bladder Cancer Across Diverse Risk Factor Profiles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- If treating obesity with GLP-1-based therapies protects the heart, could it also prevent cancer or improve cancer outcomes? The case for randomized trials.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Obesity and Cancer: Mechanisms, Epidemiological Evidence, and Potential Risk Reduction.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Navigating Therapeutic Uncertainty in Diabetes Management.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Cancer risk with GLP-1RA: what can real-world data really tell us?The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Colorectal Cancer Risk.AACE endocrinology and diabetesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The long-term cancer safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in real-world settings remains unclear, with limited long-term clinical and observational studies. We clarify the long-term cancer risk. Methods: This register-based nationwide emulated trial includes all Danes initiating treatment with GLP-1RA or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) 2007-2019, propensity score matched 1:1 on baseline characteristics and followed 10 years. The primary outcome was risk differences for cancer, estimated for long-term sustained use of GLP-1RA vs DPP-4i using g-computation accounting for time-varying patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included "death without prior cancer" and the composite outcome "death or cancer". Analyses included sex stratified estimates and Cox hazard ratios (HR). Findings: After 195,702 person-years 4758 developed cancer. Among sustained users of GLP-1RA, 4·1 (95% CI 0·4-7·2) more patients developed cancer per 100, compared to 100 DPP-4i patients 10-years post-initiation (HR: 1·35 [95% CI 1·05-1·73] 6-10 years post-initiation). The excess cancer risk was 6·6 (95% CI 1·8-10·7) per 100 women and 2·2 (95% CI -2·2 to 6·2) per 100 men. Fewer patients "died without prior cancer" in users of GLP-1RA (per 100 users: -4·9 [95% CI -7·6 to -2·4]). There was no difference in risk of "death or cancer" per 100 users: -1·15 (95% CI -4·9 to 2·5). Interpretation: Long-term sustained users of GLP-1RA had a small increased risk of cancer; potentially explained by a survival benefit. Residual confounding by body mass index cannot be ruled out. Funding: The Scientific Committee of the Danish Cancer Society (R354-A20492-23-S3 to LSM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.