ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Self-management and role of nurses of diabetic patients: a critical narrative literature review during COVID-19 pandemic.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health needs assessment: development of a simplified risk probability scale design for rapid mental health screening in emergency frontline rescue teams.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Platelets as central hubs of inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During COVID-19 and the postepidemic phase, the concept of a frontline emergency response team was gradually expanded [based on a previous clinical trial, https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier (ChiCTR2500103976)]. The professional scope of nurses gradually expanded towards the digital. We selected the digital interventions implemented by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic and self-management by diabetes patients as the research context. Aims: To synthesise a framework for the module-intensity-outcome of digitalised care during COVID-19. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for literature related to the role of nurses and self-management of diabetes patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, and then used these literature as 'seed literature' for a snowball search. We synthesised all the evidence using a directional evidence synthesis method, a narrative description method, and a visual presentation method. Results: A total of 10 publications were retrieved from the PubMed database, involving a cumulative total of 5,834 adults. This indicates that using these 10 'seed literature' for secondary literature retrieval enhances the persuasiveness of this method. Using these 'seed literature', an additional 28 literature were retrieved using the snowball method. Digital nursing has developed rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic due to challenges in patient self-management. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients sought digital nursing services from nurses due to disrupted healthcare services, surging mental health issues, and unhealthy lifestyles. In this model, nurses serve as a bridge between digital nursing services, the healthcare system, and patients. Digital nursing services not only bridge the gap in nursing services during healthcare crises but also expand the scope of nurses' professional roles. Conclusion: Nurse-led digital care with a clear mix of "modules and intensity" may have directional benefits for diabetes self-management and metabolic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.