SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Clinical evidence of acupuncture for luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical efficacy of acupuncture for women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical evidence of acupuncture for infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to systematically assess the efficacy of acupuncture in women with luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome (LUFS) based on existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A search of eight databases and one clinical trial database was conducted on May 3, 2025, to identify relevant RCTs examining the benefits of acupuncture for LUFS. The clinical outcomes of interest included two primary outcomes and five secondary outcomes. Forest plots were used to illustrate the pooled results, and sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the robustness of the evidence. Subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate whether the effect of acupuncture on the primary outcomes was related to the number of acupoints used per treatment. In addition, Begg's and Egger's tests were conducted to quantitatively examine publication bias among the studies. Results: A total of 15 RCTs from China involving 1,030 participants with LUFS were included. According to the pooled results, acupuncture intervention effectively increased the ovulation rate by 25% [risk difference (RD) = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.21-0.30, Conclusions: This pooled evidence from Chinese RCTs reveals that acupuncture is a promising complementary therapy for LUFS. However, these findings might not be generalizable outside China, and most trials exhibited deficient methodological reporting. Therefore, further research studies with more rigorous designs and larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture for LUFS. Systematic review registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk, identifier CRD420251062225.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.