SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Dose-response of acupuncture on ovulation rates in polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis and exploratory dose-response analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of acupuncture-related therapies on endocrine and metabolic outcomes in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture-related therapies in improving insulin resistance, reproductive endocrine outcomes, and ovarian morphology in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in improving ovulation rates in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to identify optimal dosage parameters, including the number of acupoints, treatment frequency, and session duration, using integrated pairwise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis (NMA), and model-based dose-response modeling. Methods: Nine databases were searched up to January 2025, yielding 43 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 4,827 participants that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture, pharmacotherapy, or conventional therapy control group. Pairwise meta-analysis, NMA, and model-based dose-response modeling were performed. Results: Acupuncture alone significantly increased ovulation rates compared with sham acupuncture (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.27) and pharmacotherapy (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.20). Additionally, acupuncture combined with herbal medicine outperformed pharmacotherapy (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12-1.43). NMA ranked acupuncture combined with herbal medicine as the most effective intervention (SUCRA = 97.8%). Dose-response modeling identified the following optimal protocols: for acupuncture alone, 30 minutes per session, 29 acupoints, three sessions per week for 24 weeks; and for combined therapy, 19 minutes per session, 26 acupoints, four sessions per week for 24 weeks. Conclusion: Acupuncture is an effective non-pharmacological intervention for PCOS-related ovulatory dysfunction, with its efficacy dependent on precise dosing parameters. These findings highlight the need for standardized protocols in future trials to validate dose-response thresholds and to optimize personalized treatment strategies. Systematic review registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk, identifier PROSPERO (CRD420250651353).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.