ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Transfer of remote ischemic preconditioning plasma from heart transplant patients into isolated perfused rat hearts prior ischemia/reperfusion injury-a translational study of cardioprotection.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown in several experimental studies as an organ protective procedure against ischemic injury, but the implementation of RIPC into routine clinical practice has so far failed due to contradictory study results. However, in order to identify patient groups that could benefit from RIPC, numerous clinical trials have been initiated, but only one study with patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTX). In HTX patients, RIPC appears to be cardioprotective when used immediately before surgery, while it has not been investigated whether the cardioprotective effect of RIPC is longer lasting. Therefore, this study assessed if a RIPC procedure prior to HTX has a cardioprotective potential in a later time window. To avoid masking a potential cardioprotective effect of RIPC in HTX patients by reduced susceptibility to cardioprotective signals due to comorbidities and medications in these patients, this study investigates the protective potential of this plasma in healthy young rats. Thus, male HTX patients were treated with a sham or a RIPC procedure (3 cycles with 5 min inflating/deflating) via a blood pressure cuff at the left upper limb prior surgery. After HTX, blood was collected at arrival on intensive care unit, 24 and 48 h post-surgery. The isolated plasma was transferred to isolated-perfused rat hearts before induction of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cardiac function was determined by left ventricular pressure measurements and infarct size by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. In all measurements, no differences were observed between the sham- or RIPC plasma-treated groups at the respective time points. This suggests that RIPC plasma from HTX patients, at least in the experimental setup used, has no cardioprotective potential at later time points. This lack of effect could for instance be explained by either no or an insufficient amount of cardioprotective signals are produced or/and released into the blood following the RIPC procedure and needs to be explored in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.