Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952053›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Validation of a Deep Learning-Assisted Evaluation of Total Corneal Endothelial Cells Viability.

Matteo Airaldi, Filippo Airaldi, Zhuangzhi Gao, Alessandro Ruzza, Mohit Parekh, Diego Ponzin, Stephen Kaye, Francesco Semeraro, Stefano Ferrari, Yalin Zheng and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matteo AiraldiDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Filippo AiraldiDelft Center for Systems and Control, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Zhuangzhi GaoDepartment of Eye and Vision Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alessandro RuzzaFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venezia, Italy.
Mohit ParekhSchepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Diego PonzinFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venezia, Italy.
Stephen KayeSt Paul's Eye Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Francesco SemeraroOphthalmic Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italia.
Stefano FerrariFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venezia, Italy.
Yalin ZhengDepartment of Eye and Vision Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Vito RomanoDepartment of Eye and Vision Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the validation of a novel automated analysis of preoperative pan-corneal endothelial cell viability. Methods: Preclinical experimental study. Dead endothelial cells and denuded areas of Descemet membrane of corneoscleral rims were stained with trypan blue (TB) 0.05%. Endothelial mortality was estimated by an experienced eye bank technician ("gold standard") and by deep learning-aided automated segmentation of TB-positive areas (TBPAs) on images of the stained corneas ("V-CHECK method"). V-CHECK mortality was calculated for the whole cornea and for concentric 2-mm rings. The agreement in the estimation of endothelial mortality between the two methods was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis and correlation tests. Results: Nineteen corneas deemed unsuitable for transplantation were used for the experiment. The automated V-CHECK method was able to accurately segment the corneal endothelium and the TBPAs. The gold standard and the V-CHECK method showed a strong positive correlation for all rings (Pearson's ρ, range 0.76-0.81, all P < 0.001). The V-CHECK method resulted in a higher average estimated endothelial mortality (mean difference range +6.5% to +9.5%). Conclusions: The V-CHECK method enables reproducible estimation of endothelial cell viability in donor corneas. Incorporating this technique into the preoperative assessment of donor corneal tissues (in the eye bank and in the operating theater) can provide a reliable evaluation of endothelial health, thereby improving the consistency of tissue quality and further supporting optimal surgical results. Translational Relevance: The V-CHECK deep learning-assisted computer vision protocol will allow surgeons and eye bank technicians to perform an independent, preoperative assessment of global corneal endothelial viability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEndothelium, CornealAgedCell SurvivalEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40952053
PMCPMC12442935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.