ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Validation of a Deep Learning-Assisted Evaluation of Total Corneal Endothelial Cells Viability.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy of Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy and surgical iridectomy in modulating perioperative subclinical inflammation after DMEK.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Influence of dextran deswelling on graft preparation and clinical outcomes in DMEK.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the validation of a novel automated analysis of preoperative pan-corneal endothelial cell viability. Methods: Preclinical experimental study. Dead endothelial cells and denuded areas of Descemet membrane of corneoscleral rims were stained with trypan blue (TB) 0.05%. Endothelial mortality was estimated by an experienced eye bank technician ("gold standard") and by deep learning-aided automated segmentation of TB-positive areas (TBPAs) on images of the stained corneas ("V-CHECK method"). V-CHECK mortality was calculated for the whole cornea and for concentric 2-mm rings. The agreement in the estimation of endothelial mortality between the two methods was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis and correlation tests. Results: Nineteen corneas deemed unsuitable for transplantation were used for the experiment. The automated V-CHECK method was able to accurately segment the corneal endothelium and the TBPAs. The gold standard and the V-CHECK method showed a strong positive correlation for all rings (Pearson's ρ, range 0.76-0.81, all P < 0.001). The V-CHECK method resulted in a higher average estimated endothelial mortality (mean difference range +6.5% to +9.5%). Conclusions: The V-CHECK method enables reproducible estimation of endothelial cell viability in donor corneas. Incorporating this technique into the preoperative assessment of donor corneal tissues (in the eye bank and in the operating theater) can provide a reliable evaluation of endothelial health, thereby improving the consistency of tissue quality and further supporting optimal surgical results. Translational Relevance: The V-CHECK deep learning-assisted computer vision protocol will allow surgeons and eye bank technicians to perform an independent, preoperative assessment of global corneal endothelial viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.