ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Etiological workup of pseudotumor cerebri in pediatric patients-is it really necessary?
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) is a relatively common cause of headaches in children. In order to exclude secondary causes, an extensive laboratory workup is generally recommended. This assessment causes blood loss, discomfort and a financial burden. To our knowledge, the diagnostic significance of such workup is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical yield of PTC laboratory workup in a pediatric tertiary medical center. This is a retrospective study in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Included were children hospitalized between 2010-2020 with new diagnosis of definite PTC, as confirmed by a certified pediatrician and ophthalmologist. Abnormal results were reviewed by two pediatricians for clinical significance. 75 children (58.7% girls, mean age 10.9 ± 4.25 years) with PTC were included. Secondary known causes for PTC were found in 20%, and 28% had other pre-existing medical conditions. Mean BMI was 24.53 ± 8.65 kg/m
conclusionOur findings suggest that most PTC etiologies can be identified through medical history and physical examination, which may imply that an extensive laboratory work-up, except for vitamin D levels, may not be routinely required. WHAT IS KNOWN: • An extensive laboratory workup is routinely recommended to exclude secondary PTC. • The clinical utility of PTC workup has not been assessed. WHAT IS NEW: • A comprehensive medical history and physical examination probably suffices to diagnose secondary PTC. • An extensive laboratory work-up, except for vitamin D levels, may not be routinely required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.