Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952556›Full record

Trial reportCurrent medical science2025

Remimazolam-Remifentanil versus Propofol-Remifentanil for Spontaneous Ventilation During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jing-Hao Huang, Hui-Jin Huang, Hong-Xin Gao, Liu-Rong Lin, Xin Ling, Qian Zhou, Xian-Zhong Lin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing-Hao Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Hui-Jin Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Hong-Xin GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Liu-Rong LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Xin LingDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Qian ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Xian-Zhong LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China. lxzyjs@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOptimizing sedation to minimize respiratory depression during fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) presents an ongoing challenge. This trial compared the safety and efficacy of remimazolam-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil for maintaining spontaneous ventilation in patients undergoing FOB.

methodsThis pre-registered randomized controlled trial enrolled 103 consecutive candidates for FOB (April 2023 to April 2024). After excluding 10 ineligible participants, 93 were enrolled in a two-phase study. In the initial dose-determination phase, 21 participants underwent dose escalation to establish the induction dose of remimazolam (0.35 mg/kg) using the modified Dixon's method. Subsequently, 72 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to remimazolam-remifentanil group (Group R-R) or propofol-remifentanil group (Group P-R) (n = 36 each). Remifentanil was administered by target-controlled infusion (3.0 ng/mL plasma concentration) in both groups. Group R-R received remimazolam 0.35 mg/kg, while Group P-R received propofol 2.0 mg/kg after remifentanil loading. Standardized supplemental doses were administered for inadequate sedation (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score >1 or Bispectral index >75). The primary endpoint was the incidence of respiratory depression, defined as SpO

resultsGroup R-R demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (11.1% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.045) and of hypotension requiring vasopressors (16.7% vs. 41.7%; P = 0.020). However, transient involuntary movements (25.0% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.111) and cough (38.9% vs. 22.2%; P = 0.125) were numerically more frequent in Group R-R, though not statistically significant. All procedures were completed successfully without discontinuation. Hypertension, arrhythmias, procedural times, and satisfaction scores were comparable between groups (all P > 0.05).

conclusionsCompared to propofol-remifentanil, remimazolam-remifentanil provides effective moderate sedation for FOB with superior respiratory safety and reduced hypotension requiring vasopressors, despite a numerically higher incidence of transient movement and cough. It thus represents a promising alternative for maintaining spontaneous ventilation during FOB.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesBronchoscopyHypnotics and SedativesPropofolRemifentanilAdultAgedFemaleFiber Optic TechnologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesPropofolRemifentanilremimazolamEffective doseFiberoptic bronchoscopyRemifentanilRemimazolamRespiratory depression

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.