Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953440›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2025

Machine Learning Approach for Frailty Detection in Long-Term Care Using Accelerometer-Measured Gait and Daily Physical Activity: Model Development and Validation Study.

Xiaoping Zheng, Ziwei Zeng, Kimberley S van Schooten, Yijian Yang

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoping Zheng *Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-130X
Ziwei Zeng *Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-1842
Kimberley S van SchootenNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0902-8440
Yijian YangDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-186X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty affects over 50% of older adults in long-term care (LTC), and early detection is critical due to its potential reversibility. Wearable sensors enable continuous monitoring of gait and physical activity, and machine learning has shown promise in detecting frailty among community-dwelling older adults. However, its applicability in LTC remains underexplored. Furthermore, dynamic gait outcomes (eg, gait stability and symmetry) may offer more sensitive frailty indicators than traditional measures like gait speed, yet their potential remains largely untapped.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether frailty in LTC facilities could be effectively identified using machine learning models trained on gait and daily physical activity data derived from a single accelerometer.

methodsThis study is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of baseline data from a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial. Of the 164 individuals initially enrolled, 51 participants (age: mean 85.0, SD 9.0 years; female: n=24, 47.1%) met the inclusion criteria of completing all assessments required for this study and were included in the final analysis. Frailty status was assessed using the fatigue, resistance, ambulation, incontinence, loss of weight, nutritional approach, and help with dressing (FRAIL-NH) scale. Participants completed a 5-meter walking task while wearing a 3D accelerometer. Following this task, the accelerometer was used to record daily physical activity over approximately 1 week. A total of 34 dynamic and spatial-temporal gait outcomes, 3 physical activity variables, and 6 demographic characteristics were extracted. Five conventional machine learning models were trained to classify frailty status using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach. Model performance was evaluated based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. To enhance model interpretability, explainable artificial intelligence techniques were used to identify the most influential predictive outcomes.

resultsThe extreme gradient boosting model demonstrated the optimal performance with an accuracy of 86.3% and an area under the curve of 0.92. Explainable artificial intelligence analysis revealed that older adults with frailty exhibited more variable, complex, and asymmetric gait patterns, which were characterized by higher stride length variability, increased sample entropy, and a higher gait symmetry score.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that dynamic gait outcomes may serve as more sensitive indicators of frailty than spatial-temporal gait outcomes (eg, gait speed) in LTC settings, offering valuable insights for enhancing frailty detection and management.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseFrail ElderlyFrailtyGaitMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLong-Term CareMalefrailtygaitlong-term caremachine learningphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID40953440
PMCPMC12481141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.