ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Extraskeletal para-articular osteochondroma adjacent to the cervical spine: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extraosseous osteochondroma of the hypothenar region: a case report and literature review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtraskeletal osteochondromas are well-circumscribed osteocartilaginous lesions arising from soft tissues without bone continuity. Extraskeletal osteochondromas may present in a para-articular location, although few reported cases have occurred near the spine. Clinical diagnosis remains challenging as these tumors can be difficult to distinguish from other ossified soft tissue lesions. Treatment includes management by observation or resection. Here the authors present a rare case of an extraskeletal osteochondroma near the cervical spine. OBSERVATIONS: A 56-year-old male presented with a palpable left paraspinal suboccipital mass that had slowly progressed over 5 years. The patient was asymptomatic and the neurological examination was nonfocal. MRI revealed an approximately 6-cm well-circumscribed heterogeneous mass in the left suboccipital area that lacked direct contact with the spine or calvarium. A hypointense capsule on T2-weighted MRI and multiple hypointense septations on T1- and T2-weighted MRI were identified. The slow rate of tumor growth suggested a benign tumor. CT imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was obtained to rule out malignancy. Surgical intervention was offered and accepted by the patient. At 2 months postoperatively, imaging demonstrated no recurrence, and the patient was asymptomatic and had improved range of motion. LESSONS: Extraskeletal osteochondroma should be considered when diagnosing osteocartilaginous paraspinal masses. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25468.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.