ReviewKorean journal of anesthesiology2026
Three-dimensional bioprinting in drug delivery: a broad-spectrum review.
Review in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4D nanoimaging-guided smart therapeutics: spatiotemporal control of disease microenvironments.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Smart Polymer Nanoparticles: Targeting Macrophages/Fibroblasts and Modulating the Microenvironment for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a transformative technology for drug delivery that offers anatomically customized, spatially controlled, and programmable release systems. These innovations hold significant promise in the fields of anesthesiology and pain medicine, particularly for postoperative pain control, where precise, localized, and sustained analgesic effects are desirable. This review highlights the current applications and future directions of 3D bioprinting for the delivery of local anesthetics, anti-inflammatory agents, and neuromodulators. By incorporating patient-specific designs and spatiotemporal release strategies, 3D-printed drug delivery systems can reduce systemic drug exposure, enhance tissue recovery, and improve analgesic efficacy. Despite these advantages, several challenges remain, including issues related to regulatory classification, manufacturing reproducibility, scalability, and long-term biocompatibility. As research advances and interdisciplinary collaboration improves, 3D bioprinting is poised to become an integral tool for personalized and procedure-specific pain management in the perioperative setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.