Evidence mapPaperPMID 40953872Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Developing and validating a risk prediction model for conversion to type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: protocol for a population-based, data-linkage study.

Vincent Versace, Douglas Boyle, Edward Janus, James Dunbar, Tesfaye R Feyissa, Yitayeh Belsti, Peta Trinder, Joanne Enticott, Brett Sutton, Jane Speight and 9 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Vincent VersaceDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia vincent.versace@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8514-1763
Douglas BoyleHealth & Biomedical Research Information Technology Unit (HaBIC R2), Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Edward JanusWestern Health Chronic Disease Alliance and Department of Medicine, Western Health-Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
James DunbarDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
Tesfaye R FeyissaDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-7312
Yitayeh BelstiMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8984-1495
Peta TrinderDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
Joanne EnticottMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-5690
Brett SuttonCSIRO Health and Biosecurity Business Unit, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jane SpeightThe Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-6896
Jacqueline BoyleEastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shamil Deshan CoorayMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-4440
Hannah BeksInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-6450
Sharleen O'ReillySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3547-6634
Kevin Mc NamaraDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
Alice R RumboldSAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Siew LimEastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Zanfina AdemiHealth Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) group, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-3522
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at seven-fold to ten-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) when compared with those who experience a normoglycaemic pregnancy, and the cumulative incidence increases with the time of follow-up post birth. This protocol outlines the development and validation of a risk prediction model assessing the 5-year and 10-year risk of T2DM in women with a prior GDM diagnosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data from all birth mothers and registered births in Victoria and South Australia, retrospectively linked to national diabetes data and pathology laboratory data from 2008 to 2021, will be used for model development and validation of GDM to T2DM conversion. Candidate predictors will be selected considering existing literature, clinical significance and statistical association, including age, body mass index, parity, ethnicity, history of recurrent GDM, family history of T2DM and antenatal and postnatal glucose levels. Traditional statistical methods and machine learning algorithms will explore the best-performing and easily applicable prediction models. We will consider bootstrapping or K-fold cross-validation for internal model validation. If computationally difficult due to the expected large sample size, we will consider developing the model using 80% of available data and evaluating using a 20% random subset. We will consider external or temporal validation of the prediction model based on the availability of data. The prediction model's performance will be assessed by using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration (calibration slope, calibration intercept, calibration-in-the-large and observed-to-expected ratio), model overall fit (Brier score and Cox-Snell R2) and net benefit (decision curve analysis). To examine algorithm equity, the model's predictive performance across ethnic groups and parity will be analysed. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis-Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI) statements will be followed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approvals have been received from Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021-179); Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (RES-22-0000-048A); the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (EO2022/5/1369); the Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee of South Australia (SA) (04-23-1056); in addition to a Site-Specific Assessment to cover the involvement of the Preventative Health SA (formerly Wellbeing SA) (2023/SSA00065). Project findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences and provided to relevant stakeholders to enable the translation of research findings into population health programmes and health policy.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalPregnancyResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSouth AustraliaVictoriaDiabetes in pregnancyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pregnant WomenProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID40953872
PMCPMC12434774

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.