ArticleChinese neurosurgical journal2025
Exploring deep learning and hybrid approaches in molecular subgrouping and prognostic-related genetic signatures of medulloblastoma.
Article in Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning (DL) based on MRI of medulloblastoma enables risk stratification, potentially aiding in therapeutic decisions. This study aims to develop DL models that identify four medulloblastoma molecular subgroups and prognostic-related genetic signatures.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 325 patients for model development and an independent external validation cohort of 124 patients, totaling 449 MB patients from 2 medical institutes. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed MB at MRI (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted) at two medical institutes between January 2015 and June 2023 were identified. Two-stage sequential DL models were designed-MB-CNN that first identifies wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4. Further, prognostic-related genetic signatures using DL models (MB-CNN_TP53/MYC/Chr11) were developed to predict TP53 mutation, MYC amplification, and chromosome 11 loss status. A hybrid model combining MB-CNN and conventional data (clinical information and MRI features) was compared to a logistic regression model constructed only with conventional data. Four-classification tasks were evaluated with confusion matrices (accuracy) and two-classification tasks with ROC curves (area under the curve (AUC)).
resultsThe datasets comprised 449 patients (mean age ± SD at diagnosis, 13.55 years ± 2.33, 249 males). MB-CNN accurately classified MB subgroups in the external test dataset, achieving a median accuracy of 77.50% (range in 76.29% to 78.71%). MB-CNN_TP53/MYC/Chr11 models effectively predicted signatures (AUC of TP53 in SHH: 0.91, MYC amplification in Group 3: 0.87, chromosome 11 loss in Group 4: 0.89). The accuracy of the hybrid model outperformed the logistic regression model (82.20% vs. 59.14%, P = .009) and showed comparable performance to MB-CNN (82.20% vs. 77.50%, P = 0.105).
conclusionMRI-based DL models allowed identification of the molecular medulloblastoma subgroups and prognostic-related genetic signatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.