ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Caregiver Perspectives on the Use of Tele-Assessment for Toddlers with Developmental Concerns.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autism Screening in the First Year and Beyond: Comparison of Multiple Measures.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most telehealth studies have focused on caregiver satisfaction with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) assessments. Few have examined caregiver perceptions of direct-to-home telehealth evaluations for children with developmental concerns broader than ASD. The current study explored caregiver perspectives (N = 439) of the telehealth process, including technology barriers and satisfaction with remote delivery of diagnostic feedback, before and after a 24-month tele-assessment, in children from four outcome groups (ASD, Speech-Language Concerns, Other Developmental Concerns, and No Concerns). The results indicated overall high levels of caregiver satisfaction and acceptability across all outcome groups, although the ASD group had a lower rate (89%) than the other groups (99-100%) of rating "very true" to feeling like a valued partner in the tele-assessment, the evaluation meeting their needs (89% v. 94-99%), and understanding the results (86% v. 96-98%). Families of children with Speech-Language Concerns, the largest diagnostic outcome group, were highly satisfied and found tele-assessment acceptable. There were no differences in caregiver perceptions of the tele-assessment process based on whether they had prior concerns about their child or not. Few technology barriers were reported by any groups and socio-demographic variables (race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, travel distance from medical center) were not associated with differences in technology access or satisfaction with the tele-evaluations. Overall, these findings support the use of tele-assessment for a wide range of children whose families may not have access to in-person assessment services, as well as suggest ways to further improve remote models of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.