ArticleReproduction & fertility2025
Application of machine learning to predict delayed fecundability among women in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Delayed fecundability, defined as trying to conceive for ≥12 months without success, is a growing global concern due to the threat of fertility rates falling below the replacement level. This study aimed to predict delayed fecundability and identify influential predictors. Secondary data from recent Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) surveys on fertility, contraception, and reproductive health in five sub-Saharan African countries were used. Preprocessing and feature engineering included imputation, encoding, and correlation filtering. Feature selection was done using the Boruta algorithm. Machine learning models, including random forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were developed and optimized via grid search with cross-validation. Models were compared using default hyperparameters. Interpretability was enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) plots, and heterogeneity was explored with subgroup SHAP analysis to identify context-specific predictor effects. Delayed fecundability was present in 31.01% of women. Grid search optimization improved model performance, with random forest achieving the highest accuracy (79.2%) and AUC (0.94). SHAP analysis identified key predictors, including age 36-49 (0.211), being married (0.208), ovulation-inducing treatment (0.173), and herbal remedy use (0.118). Subgroup SHAP analysis revealed heterogeneity: younger age reduced risk in 15-25-year-olds, fertility treatment history was the main risk driver in treated women, and marital status and childbirth had variable effects across subgroups. The random forest model best predicted delayed fecundability, with age, marital status, and treatment history as key predictors. Subgroup SHAP analysis revealed risk patterns across populations. Targeted screening and tailored fertility counseling, especially for couples with prior fertility treatments, are recommended to support timely conception. Lay summary: Many women struggle to get pregnant even after trying for a year or more, a condition called delayed fecundability. This issue is becoming more common worldwide and can signal problems with fertility. We used data from surveys in five African countries to find out which factors may predict this delay. Using computer models that can learn from data, we found that age, marital status, and past use of fertility treatments were strong predictors. Our best model correctly identified nearly 80% of women with delayed fecundability. To make the findings easy to understand, we used a method that explains how each factor influences the result. We also found that the effects of these factors vary by age and treatment history. Our results can help health workers identify women at higher risk earlier, especially in places where fertility services are limited, and provide them with better, more personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.