ArticlePloS one2025
Construction and application of a predictive model for optimal peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion depth in preterm infants under high-frequency ultrasound guidance based on clinical parameters.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to construct and validate a predictive formula based on routine clinical parameters for determining the optimal catheter placement depth (OCPD) in preterm infants undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion via the basilic vein (BV) or axillary vein (AXV). The goal is to provide a standardized reference protocol for precise PICC placement in neonatal intensive care, with the aim of enhancing procedural accuracy and reducing catheter-related complications.
methodsThis prospective study enrolled 105 preterm infants, who were categorized into two groups based on the puncture site: the basilic vein PICC group (BV-PICC, n = 59) and the axillary vein PICC group (AXV-PICC, n = 46). All catheter placements were performed under high-frequency ultrasound guidance to ensure accurate positioning and optimal catheter depth. The optimal catheter insertion length was recorded for each infant. Subsequently, clinical data were collected and analyzed, including gestational age, head circumference, chest circumference, maximum abdominal circumference, mid-forearm circumference, body weight, and body length. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between optimal catheter depth and the clinical parameters of the preterm infants. Based on this analysis, a predictive formula for PICC insertion depth in preterm infants was developed using clinical parameters.
resultsIn the BV-PICC group, birth weight and weight at the time of catheterization were identified as significant predictors. The optimal catheter placement depth (cm) was calculated using the following formula: OCPD = 8.205 + 0.005 × birth weight (g)-0.003 × weight at catheterization (g). In the AXV-PICC group, only body length at catheterization was identified as a significant predictor. The formula was: OCPD = 1.024 + 0.177 × body length at catheterization (cm).
conclusionThe predictive formulas for the OCPD of PICC inserted via different pathways in preterm infants, developed under high-frequency ultrasound guidance and based on clinical parameters, demonstrated accuracy and excellent clinical applicability. These formulas provide a valuable reference for both standardized and individualized PICC placement in preterm infants, thereby facilitating evidence-based clinical decision-making and potentially reducing catheter-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.