ReviewAging and disease2025
From Dual Decline to Clinical Consequences: Mechanistic Pathways and Health Outcomes of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.
Review in Aging and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome, defined by the coexistence of slow gait and subjective cognitive decline (SCD), is increasingly recognized as an intermediate stage between normal aging and overt cognitive impairment. Its prevalence varies across populations, largely shaped by demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors. Neuroimaging evidence further supports this construct, demonstrating gray matter atrophy in prefrontal and premotor regions alongside white matter hyperintensities, both of which have been linked to motor and cognitive deficits in individuals with MCR. The pathogenesis of MCR is likely multifactorial, involving metabolic, inflammatory, and genetic mechanisms that interact to accelerate vulnerability to neurodegeneration. Importantly, MCR has been shown to predict adverse outcomes, including dementia, falls, frailty, and increased mortality, underscoring its potential utility as an early clinical marker of neurodegenerative progression. Given these implications, recent studies have explored preventive and therapeutic strategies, such as aerobic exercise, dual-task cognitive training, dietary interventions, and pharmacological approaches targeting inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, that may mitigate MCR-related risks. Future research should aim to refine diagnostic criteria, integrate multimodal assessments, and develop personalized interventions to more effectively prevent or delay cognitive and motor decline in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.