In one paragraphArticle in JCO oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
23 authors.
Lisa ModelevskyClinical Pharmacy Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Aaron MitchellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-3515 Ross S FirestoneMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Alice X WangClinical Pharmacy Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Tala ShekarkhandMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Neha KordeMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-4318 Malin L HultcrantzMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-6495 Alexander M LesokhinMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sham MailankodyMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-9561 Hani HassounMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-2036-1749 Urvi A ShahMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-8419-1091 Kylee MaclachlanMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-4854 Sridevi RajeeveMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3458-824X Hamza HashmiMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Dhwani PatelMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Gunjan L ShahTransplant and Cellular Therapy Services, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9977-0456 Michael ScordoTransplant and Cellular Therapy Services, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9484-0240 Heather J LandauTransplant and Cellular Therapy Services, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3152-1189 Sergio GiraltTransplant and Cellular Therapy Services, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-1944-5053 Saad Z UsmaniMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-5484-8731 Carlyn R TanMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7922-2594 Funding
X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4MTransdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Training GrantR25CA203650 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI IRWIN, MELINDA L · 2016 to 2025
$2.9MNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA203650
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
purposeTalquetamab is a G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D T-cell-engaging antibody, approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the MonumenTAL-1 clinical trial, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred at a frequency of 77%; however, there was no assessment of CRS rates by step-up dose. The primary objective of this study was to characterize CRS rates after each talquetamab step-up dose in a real-world setting.
methodsPatients with RRMM who completed the talquetamab once a week or once every 2 weeks step-up dosing schedule between September 2023 and November 2024 were identified via the institutional database. CRS rate after each talquetamab step-up dose was compared using the chi-square/Fisher's exact test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare difference in median time to the CRS onset. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of CRS.
resultsFifty patients completed the talquetamab step-up dosing phase during the study period; CRS occurred at a rate of 80%. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences in CRS rates between the fourth dose (4%) and each of step-up dose 1 (28%,
conclusionOur findings suggested that the fourth talquetamab dose could be administered in outpatient settings given its high tolerability. The reduced hospitalization period for talquetamab step-up dosing could reduce health care expenses.
Indexed as
Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytokine Release SyndromeMultiple MyelomaAgedAntibodies, BispecificFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedtalquetamab
Identifiers
PMID40956992
PMCPMC13660313
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390