Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40957933›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Internal uncertainty impacts social information use in risky choice across adolescence.

Simon Ciranka, Wouter van den Bos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon CirankaCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. ciranka@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-9781
Wouter van den BosCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents are often thought to be more susceptible to social influence than people in other age groups. This is often explained by altered reward processing or heightened social motivations, such as a need to belong to a group during adolescence. However, uncertainty also makes people more susceptible to social information. While researchers agree that adolescence is a time of great uncertainty, the role of uncertainty in explaining susceptibility to social influence across development remains unclear. Here, we asked 166 participants aged 10-26 to make 144 risky decisions in a lottery experiment, either with or without observing social information and nested within conditions of low and high uncertainty. Modelling susceptibility to social influence as Bayesian updating suggests that despite the same levels of uncertainty between participants, their own internal uncertainty about the utility of choices underwent a negative linear age trend, contributing to age-related differences in susceptibility to social influence across adolescence. Our results suggest that the adolescent development of peer influence is at least in part driven by age differences in the internal uncertainty about how to decide.

Identifiers

PMID40957933
PMCPMC12441144

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.